Header Right

Employment Law
Litigation
Family Law
David G. Schiller
Contact

Search this website

Bankruptcy
Litigation
Employment Law
Family Law
Attorneys

N.C.G.S. §§ 97-14 through 97-16. Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 1291, ss. 7-9.

Primary Sidebar

Employment Law

Discrimination
Equal Pay
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Family and Medical Leave Act
Non-competition Agreements
REDA
Retaliation
Retirement Benefits
Sexual Harassment
Social Security Disability
State Employees
Unemployment Benefits
Unpaid Wages
Whistleblower
Workers' Compensation
Wrongful Discharge
North Carolina Employment Security Act

Litigation

Class Actions
Deceptive Trade Practices
Defective Products
Personal Injury
False Claims Act

Family Law

Absolute Divorce
Alimony
Family Law Appeals
Child Custody
Child Support
Domestic Violence
Mediation
Name Changes
Post Separation Support
Premarital Agreements
Property Division
Separation Agreements
Alienation of Affections

Footer

Our Office

Our office is conveniently located in downtown Raleigh across from the Governor’s Mansion, with parking available on the street and in the lot behind the building.

304 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27601

Contact Us

We invite you to contact us by telephone, (919) 789-4677, to discuss your needs and learn more about how we might be able to help you. We also have contact forms for family law, general employment law, and State employees.

Search this website

Bankruptcy
Litigation
Employment Law
Family Law
Attorneys

Site Footer

Attorney David G. Schiller is licensed to practice law in North Carolina. Attorney Schiller provides the information on these pages as a public service. Information contained in these pages is not intended as, and should not be taken as, legal advice. The use of the information provided in these pages should not be taken as establishing any contractual or other form of attorney-client relationship between Attorney Schiller and the reader or user of this information. Every case that the firm describes on this website was based on its unique facts. These results do not predict outcome in future cases.